Litigation Library
Alliant Purchasing v. OMNIA Partners & Alliant Purchasing v. Premier, Inc.Case Nos. 3:25-cv-00006, 3:25-cv-00719 · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky
On August 17, Premier, OMNIA, and Alliant must tell a federal judge the status of settlement talks — one report covering two lawsuits and an arbitration.
21 public filings — free to read and download. No email, no account.
Until the joint status report is due — end of day ET, Monday, August 17, 2026
Get the analysis the morning it drops →Filtered to Alliant v. Premier, Inc. (3:25-cv-00719) · 21 documents
Show both casesThe documents that matter most
The three governing agreements, the transfer policy, both complaints, the Answer, and the controlling order.
Verified Complaint (Redacted)
R.1 · 3:25-cv-00719 · 15 pp.
Alliant's second lawsuit, filed November 2025 after both OMNIA and Premier issued replacement Recruitment & Retention Policies. Contract-term allegations are redacted in the public version; the narrative allegations and six counts are visible.
Alliant v. PremierAnswer & Affirmative Defenses — NHH and OMNIA
R.31 · 3:25-cv-00719 · 18 pp.
The defense speaks: paragraph-by-paragraph admissions and denials, eleven affirmative defenses, and the repeated assertion that by suing in court rather than arbitrating, Alliant materially breached its agreement and is subject to termination for cause.
Alliant v. PremierOrder Granting Stay — August 17, 2026 Deadline
R.60 · 3:25-cv-00719 · 1 pp.
The controlling order in the second case: all deadlines stayed for the same global settlement talks covered by 00006 R.70, with a joint status report due no later than Monday, August 17, 2026. The Status Quo Orders (R.26 and R.51) remain in effect.
Alliant v. Premier, Inc. (3:25-cv-00719)
U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · 21 documents
Litigation Watch
The open questions we're tracking across both dockets and the arbitration.
Can the Recruitment & Retention Policy be unilaterally replaced?
Both OMNIA and Premier issued replacement policies in 2025 — whether they could is at the heart of the second lawsuit. Unresolved.
Does suing in court expose a sponsor to termination for cause?
NHH and OMNIA's Answer asserts that by filing in court rather than arbitrating, Alliant materially breached its agreement. Unresolved.
Will the arbitration resolve before the lawsuits?
The same settlement discussions cover both cases and the AAA arbitration among Alliant, NHH, and Premier LP. The August 17 report covers all three fronts.
Alert me on new filings
One email when something new hits either docket. No noise.
Ask GPO Intel about these filings
Every agreement, policy, complaint, and order in this library is in scope. Ask a question in plain English and get a cited answer pointing back at the document.
- What does the escape-hatch clause permit?
- What does the R&R Policy say about change of control?
- What happens if a sponsor sues instead of arbitrating?
- How are liquidated damages calculated?
- What is the Channel Partnership Agreement between Premier and Non-Healthcare Holdings?
- Who are the defendants in Alliant Purchasing v. Premier, Inc.?
- What did OMNIA Partners and NHH argue in their Answer?
Answers cite the filing they come from. AI responses may contain inaccuracies — the underlying document above is always the record.
Frequently asked
Plain-English answers, each grounded in the filings above.
- What is Alliant Purchasing v. Premier?
- Alliant Purchasing, LLC v. Premier, Inc. et al., No. 3:25-cv-00719, is a contract case filed November 6, 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Louisville Division. It names four defendants: Premier, Inc., Premier Healthcare Alliance, L.P., Non-Healthcare Holdings, LLC, and OMNIA Partners, LLC. Alliant Purchasing is a Sponsor in the Premier Program, and the suit centers on the replacement Recruitment & Retention Policies issued in 2025 and whether that policy could be changed unilaterally. Every public filing in the docket is in this library. The allegations are unproven and the defendants have denied wrongdoing.
- What is Alliant Purchasing v. OMNIA Partners?
- Alliant Purchasing, LLC v. OMNIA Partners, LLC et al., No. 3:25-cv-00006, is the earlier of the two cases, filed January 3, 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Louisville Division, with Premier, Inc. as a co-defendant. It arises from a blocked transfer of non-healthcare member facilities to Alliant following a change of control, and turns on the change-of-control provision of Premier's Recruitment & Retention Policy. A related arbitration between Alliant, Non-Healthcare Holdings, LLC, and Premier Healthcare Alliance, L.P. is pending before the American Arbitration Association. The allegations are unproven and the defendants have denied wrongdoing.
- What is Non-Healthcare Holdings, LLC / OMNIA B&I?
- Non-Healthcare Holdings, LLC ("NHH") is the entity Premier created in approximately May 2023 to hold its non-healthcare Member and Sponsor contracts. In or after July 2023, OMNIA Partners acquired NHH from Premier — reported in SEC filings at approximately $680 million — together with a ten-year Channel Partnership Agreement under which those accounts continue purchasing through the Premier Program. That book of business is what the market now calls OMNIA B&I (Business & Industry). NHH is a named defendant in 3:25-cv-00719 and a party to the related AAA arbitration. These facts are drawn from the public filings in this library.
- What does the Recruitment & Retention Policy have to do with the cases?
- Premier's Recruitment & Retention (R&R) Policy governs whether a member facility can move between Sponsors in the Premier Program. It generally bars transfers, with a carve-out permitting a member to select a new Sponsor for a limited window after its Sponsor undergoes a change of control. Both cases turn on that carve-out — the first on whether it reached non-healthcare accounts, the second on whether the policy could be replaced unilaterally. The R&R Policy, its 2025 replacements, and the three governing agreements are all in this library.
- What happens on August 17, 2026?
- Orders in both cases require the parties to advise the court on the status of settlement discussions by August 17, 2026 — one report covering the two lawsuits and the related arbitration. GPO Intel publishes its analysis the morning after the report is filed.
- Do I need an account or an email address to read the filings?
- No. Every document in the library is free to read online and to download, with no email address, no account, and no paywall. These are public federal court records; GPO Intel organizes them and takes no position on the merits of either case.
These are public federal court records. Allegations are unproven. All defendants have denied wrongdoing. GPO Intel provides these documents for research purposes and takes no position on the merits of either case.